home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news1.halcyon.com!coho!jars
- From: jars@coho.halcyon.com (Juan Rodriguez)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: Win95 and MSVC 2.0
- Date: 29 Feb 1996 04:22:31 GMT
- Organization: Northwest Nexus, Inc. - Professional Internet Services
- Message-ID: <4h39m7$m0q@news1.halcyon.com>
- References: <3132e514.69528430@news.demon.co.uk> <825438076snz@seacloud.demon.co.uk>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: coho.halcyon.com
-
- In article <825438076snz@seacloud.demon.co.uk>,
- Ben Ashley <Ben@seacloud.demon.co.uk> wrote:
- >In article <3132e514.69528430@news.demon.co.uk>
- > Tim@wessol.demon.co.uk "Tim Hepworth" writes:
- >> I have installed Windows 95 on my PC ... and I now wish to install a copy
- >> of MS Visual C++ v2.0. My questions are as follows : Will it run ? Can I
- >> compile code that will run under Windows 95 ? Is it more trouble than it's
- >> worth ?
- >Im not sure abour MSVC 2, but I successfully installed MSVC 1.00 on Windows 95
- >and was presently surprised at the compile speed increase!
-
- I have installed under WIndows 95 Visual C++ versions 1.0, 1.5, 1.52, 2.0, 2.2,
- and 4.0. They all run as well as under Windows NT, or even better (faster).
-
-
-
-
-
- Juan Antonio Rodriguez-Sero; jars@halcyon.com;
- Lake Forest Park, WA 98155-2940, USA
- ------------------------------------------------------------
- For progress to occur, it is essential to have a forum where
- changing ones's opinion is seen as making progress toward a
- better solution, rather than as losing face.
- Bjaerne Stroustrup, "C++ report"
-